Every Capability Ori Doesn't Have Matters Less Than the One Thing Almost No AI Is Built to Track: What You Keep Doing
Any AI system, evaluated feature by feature, will have a long list of things it doesn't do — capabilities other products have, integrations it lacks, tasks it wasn't built to handle. Evaluated this way, almost any specific system looks incomplete next to the sum of everything AI in general can do.
This kind of comparison misses the more relevant question for a system built around a specific, narrow job: not what it can't do relative to everything else, but whether it does the one thing it's actually built to do — in this case, tracking and surfacing what a person keeps doing, which almost no other AI system, regardless of its broader capability, is actually designed to track at all.
A system that does one specific, hard, and rare thing well isn't weakened by a long list of things it doesn't do that were never its job in the first place. The relevant comparison isn't against a hypothetical system that does everything; it's against the near-total absence of systems that do this one specific thing at all.
What matters, for this particular problem, isn't the length of the capability list. It's whether the one capability that actually addresses the problem — noticing what a person keeps doing — is present, well-built, and reliably delivered, which is a different and narrower bar than general capability comparison implies.
Part of Explain Ori →
Momar Lissa Ndiaye ("MLN") is the Founder & CEO of weyoga Inc., a Delaware company. — weyoga.ai · mln@weyoga.ai